Survey + Open Benchmark

End-to-End Neural Image Coding

A review of foundations, evolution, deployment, and outlook for neural image compression, paired with TinyLIC: an open lightweight neural image codec for practical system-level evaluation.

Taxonomy of representative works in end-to-end learned image coding

Review taxonomy: core coding components and practical extensions.

A review built around codec systems

The survey follows learned image coding from VAE-based foundations to practical deployment issues that decide whether a neural codec can become a reliable compression system.

CoreFramework

Nonlinear transforms, quantization, entropy models, and rate-distortion optimization.

PracticeDeployment

Variable rate, cross-platform consistency, model robustness, lightweight deployment, and standardization.

BenchmarkTinyLIC

A reproducible reference codec for rate-distortion-complexity and system trade-off studies.

TINYLIC: An Open Neural Image Codec

TinyLIC is designed as a transparent, efficient, and extensible reference codec rather than a large model chasing only the strongest R-D curve.

  • Complexity-aware scaling: Nano, Small, and Base variants at approximately 10, 20, and 50 KMACs/pixel.
  • Practical tools: variable-rate coding, INT8 consistent decoding, adversarially robust training, progressive coding, and loss-resilient coding.
  • Two objectives: distortion-oriented models for PSNR and perception-oriented models for LPIPS/FID studies.
TinyLIC as a practical benchmark for learned image compression

TinyLIC benchmark overview: model budgets, baseline modes, practical mechanisms, and optimization goals.

Compact models, competitive performance

TinyLIC is evaluated on Kodak, CLIC, Tecnick, and JPEG AI test images. Lower BD-rate is better; VTM 22.0 is the distortion-oriented anchor.

Variant Dec. KMACs/pixel Params Kodak CLIC Tecnick
Nano9.993.16M14.7814.6812.76
Small19.994.76M5.434.632.73
Base50.7610.57M-0.79-1.76-4.21